tableaupublic            

Menu

Official Statistics Website - On the “statistical information” menu the press releases, tables and time series are available in English. The Statistical Yearbook and the Tourism Statistics publications also have information in English.

tableaupublic            

Newsletters

Subscribe to our newsletter and get statistical data as soon as it is available!...

For the 1995-2018 period

Regional Directorate of Statistics of Madeira releases “Time Series of the Regional Accounts”

Following the retropolation of the Regional Accounts according to base 2016, made available recently on Statistics Portugal (INE) website, the Regional Directorate of Statistics of Madeira (DREM) releases today the “Time Series of Regional Accounts 1995-2018”. Last December, the first data according to the new base were released but only for the 2016-2018 period. The aforementioned retropolation consists in recalculating the information for the different macroeconomic variables since 1995, according to the premises of base 2016. However, there are not significant differences compared to the data of the previous base (base 2011).

From the analysis of the “Time Series of the Regional Accounts 1995-2018) now released, the following conclusions stand out:

- During 1995-2018, the longest period of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth in the Autonomous Region of Madeira (ARM) was between 2002 and 2008. Inversely, a 3-year economic recession took place between 2011 and 2013.

- The year with the largest GDP growth was 2002 (8.3%), while 2012 was the year with the most significant drop (-7.7%). Compared to the other NUTS2 regions (Norte, Centro, Metropolitan Area of Lisbon, Alentejo, Algarve and Autonomous Region of Azores), these the highest changes in both ways (positive and negative).

- The average growth rate of the GDP between 1996 and 2018 stood at 1.8% in the ARM, the same as in the Autonomous Region of the Azores (ARA), and the highest among all NUTS 2 regions and thus above national average (1.3%).

- The negative differential in the GDP per inhabitant between the ARM and the country went from 19% in 1995 to only 3% in 2018. However, in 2005, the GDP per inhabitant stood above national average and in 2006 and 2011 it was the same. In the case of the ARA, the differential towards the ARM was in 1995 of only 3.9 percentage points, while in 2018 it rose to 8.8 p.p..

- The ARM converged not only with country, but also with the European Union. In 1995, the GDP per inhabitant in the ARM (measured in purchasing power parity, i.e. having in consideration the different cost of living in the EU countries) was of only 64.8% of the EU28 average, while in 2018 it reached 74.5%. It should be highlighted that between 2005 and 2009 this indicator stood above 80%, with its apex in 2006 (82.6%).

- Labour productivity, measured by the ratio between the Gross Value Added (GVA) and the employed population, reached a record high in 2018 (34.7 thousand euros), standing however below national average (35.9 thousand euros). Having the country as reference (PT=100), the Region also converged in this indicator, going from 78.1% of the national average in 1995 to 96.6% in 2018. This performance was different from that of the ARA, which in the same period stagnated around 88%.

- The investment rate, the ratio between the Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF) and the GVA, is another indicator in which the ARM stood out, particularly in the 1995-2011 period, in which this metric was higher than national average, reaching the maximum in 2008 (73.8%), with a differential towards the country of over 40 p.p.. From 2012 on, the investment rate dropped sharply to values under 20% and always lower than the national average.

- Regarding the Disparity Index of Gross Disposable Income (GDI) per inhabitant, between 1995 and 2017 (last available year) and compared to the country’s average, the Autonomous Region of Madeira went from a differential of +1.9% (i.e. standing above the national average), to the opposite scenario in 2017, staying below the aforementioned average by 2.2%. In fact, the analysis of the 1995-2017 period, shows two very different subperiods: between 1995 and 2009 this indicator stood always above national average (with the exception of the year 2000) and another, since 2010, with opposite results, with the minimum being recorded in 2015 (6% negative differential compared to the country’s average).

contasregionais9518 eng

For more information, please click on:

International Statistical Cooperation

MAC14 20

International Statistical Cooperation

MAC14 20

Statistical Literacy

formation3

Statistical Literacy

formation3
Go to top